Sergeant Ken Ochoa, a transgender serving American man said, “It was heart-breaking, my stomach dropped” upon seeing Trump’s tweets but noted, “I don’t even know if I can [continue serving]… It just seems like chaos, so many unknowns.” The Department of Defense has referred all questions on the banning of transgender people in the American military to The White House stating new information will be available soon. As of yet, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders has yet to make a statement—instead saying “I would imagine the Department of Defense will be the lead on that”.
Trump’s stance during his campaign outwardly portrayed him in favor of supporting the LGBTQ people of America. Such actions seem to once again suggest Trump was lying or he has just forgotten what the T stands for. Trump has seemingly overlooked—or does simply not understand—the bravery that’s not only required to enlist and to “come out” and outwardly express the gender that transgender people identify with.
The combination of these two elements is surely exactly the kind of attributes that should be in the armed services. But then, this is nothing new for Trump; he chooses power of bravery—favoring being the loudest voice rather the logical voice. Trans men and women have the right to choose to fight for their country and themselves everyday—Trump however chooses to demonize those who make choices far more courageous than he could ever even contemplate.
The true mark of a coward is someone who belittles and represses that which he does not understand—a statement that could be put to almost any of Trump’s policies and views.tiger essay for class 1 America cannot be seen asGreat Againwhen it’s leader is controlled by a fear of progression. LetCollege Newsknow your thoughts on the banning of transgender people in the American military.
Kayley Loveridge December 3, 2018, 05:17 December 3, 2018 Via Wikimedia Commons; photography by Bruce F. Press (2010) Astrophysicist and author Neil deGrasse Tyson is the latest in a slew of celebrity men to be accused of sexual misconduct. Speaking with the religious and spirituality site, patheos.com, three women—Tchiya Amet, Ashley Watson and Katelyn Allers—detailed accounts of sexual misconduct at the hands of Tyson.
Amet, who was a student at the University of Texas at the same time as Tyson, claimed that the astrophysicist drugged and raped her while the two were at college. Watson accused him of making unwanted sexual advances when she worked as his assistant, causing her to quit her job. Allers has claimed he groped her at a part in 2009.
Tyson has since refuted the very serious accusations.
In a Facebook statement published on Saturday, the TV host said that he welcomes an impartial investigation into the sexual misconduct claims made against him. Tyson wrote: “For a variety of reasons, most justified, some unjustified, men accused of sexual impropriety in today’s ‘me-too’ climate are presumed to be guilty by the court of public opinion.
Emotions bypass due process, people choose sides, and the social media wars begin. “In any claim, evidence matters.
Evidence always matters. But what happens when it’s just one person’s word against another’s, and the stories don’t agree?
That’s when people tend to pass judgement on who is more credible than whom.
And that’s when an impartial investigation can best serve the truth—and would have my full cooperation to do so.” He continued: “I’ve recently been publically accused of sexual misconduct. These accusations have received a fair amount of press in the past 48 hours, unaccompanied by my reactions.http://www.magatopia.com/
In many cases, it’s not the media’s fault.
I declined comment on the grounds that serious accusations should not be adjudicated in the press. But clearly I cannot stay silent.” Fox and National Geographic, the producers of Tyson’s upcoming television programCosmos,due to premiere in 2019, have responded to the claims. In a statement, they said: “We have only just become aware of the recent allegations regarding Neil deGrasse Tyson.
We take these matters very seriously and we are reviewing the recent reports.” They added: “The credo at the heart ofCosmosis to follow the evidence wherever it leads. The producers ofCosmoscan do no less in this situation. We are committed to a thorough investigation of this matter and to act accordingly as soon as it is concluded.” These allegations of sexual misconduct come as a shock to the science community, who previously held Tyson in high esteem.
The author of several popular science books includingAstrophysics for People in a Hurry(2017) andWelcome to the Universe(2016), Tyson is also the first black person to hold the role of director of the Hayden Planetarium at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City.
Chelsie Lacny June 6, 2013, 20:57 November 15, 2017 Judy Blume and her son have spent the last few years collaborating on a project, and are now about to fulfill the dreams of all of her fans: her 1981 bookTiger Eyesis now being released as a feature film, which will be officially showing in certain theaters this Friday, June 7. It will also be available on video on demand and on iTunes.
Judy Blume has been a huge name in young adult literature since her first book was published in 1969.
She has sold more than 82 million copies of her books in 41 countries. Even now, I remember my mother buying me my first copy ofAre You There God?
It’s Me, Margaret . when I was nine years old. FromTales of a Fourth Grade NothingtoSummer Sisters , Judy Blume writes books that young readers (especially young women) and adults like to read.
They are true to real life, classic and timeless.
Blume, 75, has wanted one of her books to be adapted to film for decades. She approached her film director son, Larry, about it a few years ago, “I am not getting any younger,” she said. “I do not want to die and have someone else make movies of my books and ruin them.
I’d like to make one myself.” So began the journey to getTiger Eyesfrom print to the big screen.Tiger Eyesis the story of Davey, a young girl who is forced to move to New Mexico with her mother and brother to live with relatives after her father’s death. She meets a Native American teenager named Wolf who helps her cope with her feelings about the uprooting. The financial capabilities for a big-screen movie adaptation ofTiger Eyesbecame available in 2009.
British supermarket giant Tesco decided to dabble in the movie-making business, and offered a deal for Judy Blume and her son to createTiger Eyesfor just over $2 million. Shooting began in 2010 and took just 23 days to complete. Willa Holland was cast as Davey.
Holland had supporting roles in bothThe O.C.andGossip Girls , and Blume and her son both knew that she was perfect for the character. “There was something in her face; you could see her pain,” Larry said. “She had a very complex set of emotions in such a young person, which were right on the surface to see. She was perfect.” The character of Wolf is played by Tatanka Means, with his real-life father stepping in to play Wolf’s father.
Russell Means passed away in 2012, and this was his last film. The challenge after filming wrapped up was finding a way to get the movie to viewers. It turned out to be a nonissue; Blume’s huge fan base and big name helped get her into film festivals, and the film is now being played in about 40 theaters around the United States.
Hannah Foskett December 13, 2018, 11:33 December 13, 2018 Image courtsey of Wikimedia Commons, Photo: Melissa Rose Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams have been ordered to pay nearly $5million to the family of Marvin Gaye, as a long-running legal battle comes to a close. In 2013, the Motown legend’s family alleged that Thicke and Williams’ chart-topping singleBlurred Linesplagiarized Gaye’sGot to Give It Up.
The family initially won the case in 2015, attesting thatBlurred Lineshad the same “feel and sound” of the 1977 hit, but the pair appealed. In March this year, a Californian federal judge upheld the original ruling, resulting in an amended judgment and settlement to Gaye’s family. Thicke and Williams, along with Williams’ publishing companyMore Water From Nazareth , owe joint damages of $2.8million.
Meanwhile, Thicke has been ordered to pay an additional $1.8million and Williams, another $357,631. The Gaye family are also entitled to 50 percent of all future song royalties. The song was said to have generated a total of ?16.6million in revenue during the original trial.
The decision has sparked controversy among judges and music experts alike.
Having instigated a number of similar copyright cases in recent years, the grueling battle has set a strict precedent for the music industry. Many feel that the original verdict was mistaken, as the “feel” of a song cannot be concretely copied.
Indeed, Williams testified that he only evoked the mood of Gaye’s song and did not directly plagiarize a sequence of musical phrases or lyrics. “I was like, ‘Damn, we should make something like that, something with that groove.’ Then [Williams] started playing a little something and we literally wrote the song in about a half-hour and recorded it,” Thicke admitted in an interview withGQ . Circuit judge Jacqueline Nguyen, also disagreed with the appeal decision. She argued that the song “differed in melody, harmony and rhythm” and said the verdict “strikes a devastating blow to future musicians and composers everywhere”.
Two of Gaye’s children, however, called the resolution “a victory for the rights of all musicians” and their mother Jan added that it was a “wonderful recognition of Marvin’s creativity and the lasting value of one of his greatest songs”. As a result of the case, instances have seen Taylor Swift gift Right Said Fred a writing credit on her singleLook What You Made Me Do ; and Ed Sheeran add the writers of TLC’sNo Scrubsto his singleShape Of You . Sheeran is also accused of “copying” Marvin Gaye’s classic songLet’s Get it Onwith his 2014 ballad,Thinking Out Loud .
Editorial Staff September 15, 2015, 18:26 June 25, 2018 Image Courtesy of: http://vaping360.com/juul/ It would probably be impossible to go to any college campus across the country and not find someone using a vaporizer pen.
These little devices have become extremely popular with our generation. Not only is vaping healthier than traditional smoking, it also tastes better and gives a much better overall experience as well.
Most people who try vaping never go back to the traditional way of smoking. However, there are just so many different vape pens out there that how are you supposed to even know where to start if you want to purchase one?
If you’ve been wanting to buy a vaporizer pen but have been stuck with this same dilemma, this article is exactly what you have been looking for.
We have personally tested a large amount of pens ourselves, some good and others not so much, so this is an area we feel very comfortable talking about. Our unique experience allows us to compare all of the pens against each other and narrow down what the top units are.
And since you guys are in college and we understand money can be tight, all of the vape pens on this list are under $100.
Please also note that these are NOT e-cigarettes. The pens on this list are for those who enjoy smoking herbs and concentrates (waxes, oils, etc.) 1. The Source Orb 3 Premium Kit – $79.95 Source has quickly made a name for themselves as one of the best vaporizer companies in the industry.
Their Source Orb 2 came on the scene a couple years ago and provided a very unique experience due to the fact that it came with7 different atomizers . This allowed vapers to dial in the perfect vaping experience and find the atomizer that best suitsthem . We were (and still are) huge fans of the Orb 2, but Source stepped up their game even more and just launched the Orb 3 a few months ago. Like the Orb 2, the Orb 3 comes with 7 atomizers, but they replaced some of the old ones with brand new quartz bowl atomizers, providing a flavor unlike any other unit on the market.